Review of Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish Sandwich

February 12, 2013 Fast Food Compare 2 Comments

While watching the Super Bowl I saw the commercial for the new Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich for the first time. I thought this looks pretty good. And no, it was not because of the girl in the bikini. I really did think this looks like a good sandwich and a great idea. Grilled instead of deep-fried, at least it should be healthier I just hope it tastes as good as it looks.

To find out if this sandwich was as good as it looked I went to the drive-thru at the Carl’s Jr. at 10009 Mission George Road in Santee, CA. The first thing they asked me was if I wanted to try the new Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich, and of course I did. My order was ready as I paid for my food at the window. The server was friendly and gave me my sandwich and fries hot and fresh. Now let’s find out what I got.

What is a Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish Sandwich

Is it possible for a fast food sandwich to look better in person than on the in-store photos? In this case, YES. The in-store photos make it look more like a chicken patty than a fish filet. However, in the commercial the sandwich looks right, it’s just the in-store photos that do not do justice to this sandwich. Compare the photos. To the left is from the TV commercial, below is the in store photo that looks more like chicken and below that is a photo of what I was served.

The Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich was made with a charbroiled Atlantic Cod filet that was chard nicely to give it a crispy outside and a fully cooked center. The lettuce was crisp and fresh. The tomato was ripe and red. However, much smaller than I thought it would be considering the photo. They should have used one large tomato slice or two smaller slices. Last is the tartar sauce that was just enough to add some additional flavor without overtaking the sandwich.

Does it Taste Good?

So it’s a great looking sandwich. But, how does the Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich taste. This is one of the best fish sandwiches I have ever had at a fast food restaurant. Because it is grilled and not fried there is none of that greasy taste that you sometimes get with other fish sandwiches. Also, you taste the fish without it being fishy. The tartar sauce has a mild flavor that adds to the fish without being too tart. The tomato and lettuce add some texture that complements the sandwich nicely.

Is it Healthy?

The Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich is relatively healthy. It only has 420 Calories and 15 grams of fat. It’s very low in saturated fat at only 2.5 grams. It’s high in protein at 20 grams and 3 grams of fiber. It also only has 40 mg of cholesterol. The sodium level is at 800 mg. The carbohydrates are at 51 grams. The following are the known allergens for this sandwich: egg, fish, soy and wheat. Overall this is a one of the better options health wise that you can find at a fast food restaurant.

Compared to the McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish

In fact, experts opine that more men are known to sildenafil generic canada suffer from Erectile Dysfunction as well as reduced libido. Experts say that sexual problems are quite common in big cities sildenafil discount and metros as compared to small ones. Erectile Dysfunction Effecting Self Esteem levitra sale Because sexual issues are often a big part of self-esteem of a man and makes him feel like dying again and again. Actually sildenafil in usa the main use of this drug is made in the USA, and have simply been sold to unsuspecting customers.

The McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish sandwich is the original fast food fish sandwich. It starts with a breaded fish filet patty made from the pollock fish and deep-fried in vegetable oil. The patty is placed on a steamed bun with half a slice of American cheese and tartar sauce. The Filet-O-Fish is also relatively healthy for a fast food sandwich. With only 390 calories, 15 grams of protein, 19 grams of fat, 4 grams of saturated fat, 39 grams of carbohydrates, 40 mg of cholesterol and 590 mg of sodium. The following are the known allergens for this sandwich: egg, fish, soy, wheat and milk.

Ounce per Ounce Comparison

At first glance these numbers seem to make the McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish about the same as the Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich. However, the Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich is 65% bigger at 234 grams (8.25 ounces) compared to the Filet-O-Fish that is only 142 grams (5 ounces).

When you look at the nutrition facts side by side on a per ounce basis it is clear that the Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich is much healthier than the McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish. The Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich is better for calories, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, sodium, carbohydrates and sugars. The only nutrition facts that the McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish score better on are by providing slightly more fiber and protein.

Nutrition Facts for Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish Sandwich – without Tartar Sauce

To make the Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich even healthier you can have it without the tartar sauce. You save 50 overall calories without the tartar sauce going from 420 down to 360 and this is good because those 50 calories are from fat, reducing the fat calories from 130 down to 80. This has a real big impact on the total fat and saturated fat by reducing the total fat 19 grams down to only 9 grams. The saturated fat is reduced from 2.5 grams to 1.5 grams. There are minor reductions for cholesterol, saving 10 mg to be at 30 mg and a reduction of 90 mg of sodium to be at 710 mg. Overall carbohydrates are almost the same at 50 grams. Fiber, sugars and protein remain the same.

Summary

The McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish has long been a good choice for a good tasting fish sandwich that is also on the healthier side. However, if you are looking for an even better tasting fish sandwich then the Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish sandwich is the better choice. Not only does it taste better it is more filling for about the same nutritional values. Also, on a per ounce basis it is by far the healthier choice.

If you liked this review, please click the “Like” button under the “Find us on Facebook” section. In addition, if you want to keep up on the latest fast food reviews enter your email address under the “To Subscribe to Fast Food Compare” section.

McDonald's, Reviews

Review of McDonald’s Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger

January 24, 2013 Fast Food Compare Leave a comment

Now that the price of the McDouble has been changed from $1.00 to $1.19 they needed to add something to take its place on the dollar menu. Can the McDonald’s Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger live up to the McDouble and take its place on the extra value menu or will it be an also ran like the Daily Double.

What is a McDonalds Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger

To try this burger I went through the drive thru at the McDonalds on 8876 North Cuyamaca Street in Santee, CA. As usual the service at this McDonald’s was fast and friendly. The burger was served fresh and hot. The Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger is exactly as the name states. It is a burger with grilled onions and cheddar cheese on a regular bun and that’s it, nothing more. Not even the creamy mustard sauce found on the Angus CBO. But, somehow it works.

Taste

One can easily attain this medicine from anywhere except of an online store. you can check here commander viagra His morale was browse this buy levitra affected adversely by this accident. Whether you’re stressed, suffering from anxiety or just in need of these prescribed medications, then talk to your doctor cialis order on line for better advice. Sexual problem known as erectile dysfunction, sexual condition of a man not being able to gain and keep an erection for an extended acquisition de viagra http://martinblaser.com/excerpt.html period of time. Unlike the bland Daily Double that has no taste. The Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger was very tasty. Like the Angus CBO the cheddar cheese and grilled onions are perfect together and even without any sauce the burger was still juicy and not dry like one would expect. This burger is a keeper. It deserves its place on the dollar menu and is a good replacement item with the rising price of the McDouble.

Nutrition

The nutrition values for the Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger are pretty good. The Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger is 310 calories, has 15 grams of protein, 13 grams of fat and 33 grams of Carbohydrates.

Summary

The Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger is a great addition to the McDonald’s dollar menu for all the right reasons. Its great tasting, a good value and is not to bad when it comes to nutrition.

Burger King, McDonald's, Reviews

Review of Burger King’s Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper

December 26, 2012 Fast Food Compare Leave a comment

For this review I am going to compare the new Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper from Burger King with the Angus CBO from McDonald’s. I have already reviewed the Angus CBO and liked it a lot. Can Burger King beat the Angus CBO from McDonald’s?

Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper from Burger King

The new Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper sandwich is ¼ lb. grilled beef, topped with smoked bacon, Wisconsin white cheddar cheese, lettuce, red onions, tomatoes and pickles on a sesame seed bun.

To try the Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper I went to the Burger King at 12427 Poway RoadPoway CA 92064. I decided to dine in for this visit. I went in around 5 PM on a weekday. As I went in, there was only one family sitting in the lobby and another couple just finished getting their order for take out. I placed my order and waited. It was taking awhile so I looked to see what was going on. I could see that my food was ready but no one was there to give me my order. Finally someone came up to the front just looking around. It looked like he was lost. After a few more minutes he noticed there was an order ready and placed my order in a bag very slowly. He then noticed on the receipt that this was for dine-in so he very slowly took the items out of the bag and placed them on a tray. Once I got my order I went to a table and inspected the burger. The burger was cold and the meat looked undercooked. The cheese was missing, no pickles or tomatoes. It did have a few onions, the mayo, the bacon and a single piece of lettuce. The bun was stale and fell apart as I tried to eat this poorly prepared burger. Because this was so bad I decided that before I can give this a proper review I will need to try this burger again from a different Burger King.

.
A week later I made a second attempt at the Burger King at 6735 Mira Mesa Boulevard, Plaza Sorrento, San Diego, CA 92121. I went inside for this visit. There were only a few people in the restaurant when I went in. Service was slow and again it took awhile to get my food. I went back to my table and inspected my burger. The burger was served cold. This time the burger was prepared with almost all the proper ingredients that are shown in the photo in the window and the video menu board behind the counter. However, the advertisements shows two sliced of cheese but my burger only had one slice of cheese. I asked the counter person if it should include one or two slices of cheese. She apologized and had the “cook” stuff a second slice of cheese into the cold burger. The Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper may have been a good burger if it was prepared hot so the cheese has a chance to melt into the burger at least a little, but this was just plain terrible. The cheese tastes like wax and that is all you can taste on this burger. I will not give this another try. See the photo from the in store poster for how this burger should have looked. I know that food never looks like the photo, but this is so far off the mark that I just had to share the photo.
For nutrition the Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper is 950 calories, has 48 grams of protein, 62 grams of fat, 58 grams of carbohydrates, 62 grams of fat, 135 mg of cholesterol and 1660 mg of sodium.

Angus CBO Sandwich from McDonald’s

The Angus CBO from McDonald’s is made with the 100% Angus Beef Third Pounder, two slices of White Cheddar Cheese, Bacon, Caramelized Onions and a Creamy Mustard Sauce. The burger is juicy (by fast food standards) and the bun was fresh. If you want a good tasting burger and are not worried about eating healthy for a meal then this is a good choice.
Comparatively, you will get purchase cialis online this pill in economical price. What causes Erectile Dysfunction? Erectile Dysfunction has emerged up as a great problem for many men. http://amerikabulteni.com/2013/01/09/zero-dark-thirty-filmi-ciaden-oscara-derin-mudahale-mi/ buying sildenafil online buy tadalafil uk The Hangover Begin with the blockbuster movie that broke all records. Kamagra is the finest medication of ED in this world your penis decides to hand in an application for leave amerikabulteni.com pills cialis and is determined to not do any work during this leave.
Health wise, at 790 Calories and 41 grams of fat the Angus CBO is the least healthy burger on the McDonald’s menu. The Angus CBO also has 41 grams of fat, 62 grams of carbohydrates, 150 mg of cholesterol, 1830 mg of sodium and 45 grams of protein.

For the complete review please read my Review of the McDonald’s Angus CBO and Chicken CBO Sandwiches.

Summary

The Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper from Burger King fails on all levels. The Wisconsin White Cheddar cheese will not melt on a cold or even a warm burger. Second, there is no taste other than the cheese on this burger, and most important the nutrition values for this sandwich are off the charts as very unhealthy. At least if I am going to eat unhealthy I want something that tastes great.

For a better choice I recommend the McDonald’s Angus CBO sandwich. It has much more flavor and is worth the indulgence. The Angus CBO is not the healthiest burger out there but is much better, health wise than the Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper. The Angus CBO has 160 fewer calories than the Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper and 21 grams less of fat and 15 mg less of cholesterol. It does fair a little better but very close for carbohydrates with 3 grams less and with sodium of 170 mg less.

Jack in the Box, Reviews, Subway

Review of the Jack in the Box Sourdough Cheesesteak Melt

December 11, 2012 Fast Food Compare Leave a comment

I love a good Philly Cheesesteak. Can Jack in the Box deliver with its new Sourdough Cheesesteak Melt? Let me start by saying that I am very picky when it comes to Philly Cheesesteak. My favorite is from a little place in Venice California located at 1720 Lincoln Boulevard, Venice, CA 90291 called The Great Western Steak & Hoagie Company. The building is not much to look at from the outside or on the inside either but this will be the best Philly Cheesesteak sandwich you can have outside of Philly.

For this review though I will stick to comparing the Jack in the Box Sourdough Cheesesteak Melt to another fast food restaurant chain, the Big Philly Cheesesteak from Subway.

Sourdough Cheesesteak Melt from Jack in the Box

I have had the Jack in the Box Sourdough Cheesesteak Melt three times now. The first two times from the Jack in the Box at 2905 Alta View Drive, San Diego CA, 92139. Both times the sandwich was served with prompt service and hot. The only issue I had, was that both times there did not seem to be much meat on the sandwiches. Plenty of cheese, sauce, onions and bell peppers just very little meat. So to be sure I tried the sandwich a third time at 9337 Mission Gorge Road, Santee CA, 92071. This time there was plenty of meat (twice what I had before). The service at this Jack in the Box is always great. The sandwich was served hot and toasted perfectly.

The first two sandwiches were good. But I did not feel that I got my moneys worth with so little meat. The third sandwich with twice the meat was perfect. The sauce, onions and bell peppers make this sandwich good as the veggies are grilled and roasted to bring out the flavor and to give them the right texture to make this taste like a Philly Cheesesteak.

Big Philly Cheesesteak from Subway

The Big Philly Cheesesteak from Subway was way off the mark. It was not a bad sandwich it was just not a Philly Cheesesteak. The onions and bell peppers of course were not grilled or roasted so even though I had them toasted with the sandwich they were still too crunchy and did not have that sweet flavor you expect from a Philly Cheesesteak.
It was a breakthrough and since then the medication has been viagra australia top store available for purchase online. Share your feelings with the other one, be it about the future, past or present. levitra soft tabs And once treated, their reoccurrence can sometimes be a sign that you have an underlying health issue including improper heart or circulation, high cholesterol levels, buy tadalafil without prescription or diabetes. NSAIDs are also used, but more commonly doctors prescribe hormones, steroids and DMARDs (disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) for modulating the levitra vardenafil 20mg immune response and reducing inflammation in the plaque.
I got this sandwich at the Subway at 50 Town Center Parkway, Suite D, Santee CA 92071. I went in during lunch so it took a while to get through the line and place my order. Once I got to the front they had their assembly line process down. The first person takes your order, gets the bread, places the meat and cheese and then placing it into the toaster. Of course I upset the process by asking for the veggies to be placed on before toasting. After toasting the next person puts on the rest of the veggies and sauces. A third person cuts and wraps and the fourth takes your money. They did do a good job getting the orders through but not a very friendly crew. No “unnecessary” interaction with the customers, no have a nice day, would you like anything else. Instead of coming in just to get lunch more people might come back more frequently if it was a nice place to visit.

For taste Jack in the Box wins by far over the Subway Big Philly Cheesesteak. That is, if you can get one made with the right amount of ingredients. To compare it to a real Philly Cheesesteak I would say that Jack in the Box comes as close as you can get from a fast food place. It is by far better than their last attempt with the Philly Cheesesteak sandwich they had several years back. That one did look more like a Philly Cheesesteak but the taste was all wrong.

Nutrition

When it comes to Nutrition the Jack in the Box Sourdough Philly Cheesesteak is a little better for you than the Subway Big Philly Cheesesteak. And no it is not because Subway makes a bigger sandwich. Actually the two sandwiches are about the same size. The Jack in the Box Sourdough Philly Cheesesteak comes in at 228 grams and the Subway 6” big Philly Cheesesteak comes in at 255 grams (made as I described above).

The Sourdough Philly Cheesesteak has 145 fewer calories at 485 calories compared to 630 in the Big Philly Cheesesteak and 3 less grams of fat at 26 grams. Carbohydrates are also lower at 40 grams vs. 56 grams. Jack in the Box is higher in sodium though at 1646 compared to 1400. The other major difference is in the protein. Jack in the Box is much lower in protein at 27 grams vs. Subway at 38 grams.

Summary

For something that is close to the idea of what a Philly Cheesesteak should be the Jack in the Box Sourdough Philly Cheesesteak is as close as you are going to get from a fast food chain. They understood that it is more than just the ingredients that make it a Philly Cheesesteak. You need to prepare it the right way. Subways attempt proves that. Without grilling the onions and bell peppers it is just not a Philly Cheesesteak. Also, toasting the bun with the cheese is not enough; the cheese needs to melt into the sandwich making every bite a combination of sweet flavor. Subway missed the mark.

McDonald's, Reviews

Review of McDonald’s Angus CBO and Chicken CBO Sandwiches

November 27, 2012 Fast Food Compare Leave a comment

I first found out about this sandwich when passing by the McDonald’s at 2345 El Cajon Boulevard in San Diego and saw the banner on the roof advertising the “new CBO {cheddar bacon onion}”. I had not seen the commercials yet so I did not know if this was a sandwich, an option to existing sandwiches or what? So I went through drive thru to find out what it was.

What is a McDonald’s CBO

The CBO are three new McDonald’s sandwiches. All three have two slices of White Cheddar Cheese, Bacon, Caramelized Onions and a Creamy Mustard Sauce. The first is made with the 100% Angus Beef Third Pounder, the second is the Premium Crispy Chicken patty and the third is the Premium Grilled Chicken patty. Here is my review of the three CBO sandwiches and which one I recommend as being the best.

Angus CBO Sandwich

For this visit I tried the Angus CBO Sandwich. I placed my order and pulled up to the window to pay and get my order. The drive thru crew barely engaged me as a customer. The three people in drive thru where talking among themselves, it appeared they where talking about what someone did or was going to do on the weekend. When my food was ready they passed it to me out the window, did not say a word to me and went back to their conversation. I had to get their attention to get some extra napkins. The guy seemed bothered and passed me two napkins and went back to his conversation.

Well, on to the CBO Angus Burger. The burger was served hot and looked very good. So, hats off to the cooks. They did a good job. I liked this burger. The combination of White Cheddar Cheese, Bacon, Caramelized Onions and the Creamy Mustard Sauce was perfect. The burger was juicy (by fast food standards) and the bun was fresh.

Health wise, at 790 Calories and 41 grams of fat the Angus CBO is the least healthy burger on the McDonald’s menu. The Angus CBO also has 62 grams of carbohydrates, 1830 mg of sodium and 45 grams of protean. If you want a good tasting burger and are not worried about the eating healthy for a meal then this is a good choice.

Premium Crispy Chicken CBO Sandwich

For the Premium Crispy Chicken CBO Sandwich I went to the McDonald’s at 8876 North Cuyamaca Street in Santee, CA. This is one of my favorite McDonald’s as I almost always get great service and the food is usually made correctly. This visit was no exception. Everything was perfect.

The Crispy Chicken CBO sandwich was served hot and looked great. But, I did not like it. The combination of the crispy chicken patty with the creamy ingredients did not seem to mesh together like they did on the Angus CBO sandwich. The taste of the sauce was separate from the chicken and did not enhance the taste of the chicken at all.
Engage your prospects with a sequential trail of discovery plotting a series of events to do with your subject of interest. cialis generika go to these guys You other india online cialis also have the chance to enjoy online security since the site is very secure and shall not expose your online credit details. You might suffer from* Blindness* Vigorous headache* Heart attack * Blood pressure* Impotence* Lasting erection, which shall last for several hours. levitra 20mg uk Man buy professional viagra undergoing Forzest treatment may experience ordinary ill effects which are definite section of each drug and same happens with Forzest online.
For nutrition the Crispy Chicken CBO is 630 calories, has 32 grams of protein, 29 grams of fat, 61 grams of carbohydrates and 1630 mg of sodium.

Premium Grilled Chicken CBO Sandwich

For the Premium Grilled Chicken CBO Sandwich I went back to the McDonald’s at 8876 North Cuyamaca Street in Santee, CA. Again the service was outstanding.

The Grilled Chicken CBO sandwich was also served hot and looked great. And guess what, I liked it. In this case the creamy ingredients did enhance the flavor of the chicken. The texture of the chicken in this case allowed for the sauce to mix better and create a great taste.

For nutrition this is a great choice at only 480 calories, 36 grams of protein, 16 grams of fat, 47 grams of carbohydrates and 1460 mg of sodium.

Summary

When I get a chicken sandwich I prefer a crispy chicken as I like the texture better and I feel that I’m eating healthier (than a burger) and not sacrificing taste. But, this is the exception when the grilled chicken actually tastes better than the crispy. Also, when I go for fast food I prefer beef over chicken and only get chicken when I am feeling I should eat healthier at that moment. So for me to say that the Premium Grilled Chicken CBO Sandwich is as good as the Angus CBO Sandwich is saying a lot. So, with the Grilled Chicken CBO coming in at only 480 calories and 16 grams of fat vs. the Angus CBO with 790 calories and 41 grams of fat it is an easy choice to select the Premium Grilled Chicken CBO Sandwich as the best CBO sandwich.

What is a Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish Sandwich

Does it Taste Good?

Is it Healthy?

Compared to the McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish

Ounce per Ounce Comparison

Nutrition Facts for Carl’s Jr. Charbroiled Atlantic Cod Fish Sandwich – without Tartar Sauce

Summary

Share this:

Related Posts

What is a McDonalds Grilled Onion Cheddar Burger

Taste

Nutrition

Summary

Share this:

Related Posts

Wisconsin White Cheddar Whopper from Burger King

Angus CBO Sandwich from McDonald’s

Summary

Share this:

Related Posts

Sourdough Cheesesteak Melt from Jack in the Box

Big Philly Cheesesteak from Subway

Nutrition

Summary

Share this:

Related Posts

What is a McDonald’s CBO

Angus CBO Sandwich

Premium Crispy Chicken CBO Sandwich

Premium Grilled Chicken CBO Sandwich

Summary

Share this:

Related Posts

Reviews and Nutrition Facts for People Who Enjoy Fast Food